Remove Diplomatic Immunity, OR Use International Law properly
It was somewhat of an outrage when Muammar Gaddafi was murdered by the rebels in a fairly horrific scene, when in reality he should have stood trial in a court of International Law. This is the kind of barbarity that should not happen anymore. He was captured, and would have had no difficulty being put on trial. He also now has the ability to become a martyr, and that could have some very dangerous repercussions.
The idea of removing diplomatic immunity is more difficult, and admittedly a bit more ill-advised, but my point is that a lot of the world's leaders need to stand trial for the clear violations of their country's constitution, and international law. The unconstitutional wars in the US for example that have been happening since the 50s, and the endless Western foreign manipulation into other country's leadership.
Thoughts?
15 Comments
Anonymous
000349821
000001041
Anonymous
000001001
babelfish
babelfish
AdmiralCheung
1. Under Gaddafi the people of Libya was placed first in terms of Human Rights.
2. Local Government has more power than state government.
3. Education, electricity and basic Humanitarian supplies are free in Lybia.
4. Lybia is one of the few countries in the world that was debt free.
5. Though a dictatorship, the Lybian people were likely to be more democratic than most democracy.
I understand about the killings of opposition, and I do not support it at all. However all Gaddafi wanted was the people to be benefited. Yes I do believe that Gaddafi should answer to his crimes but I do not believe people should condemn him just because he is a dictator and the education we have about dictatorship as Satan's right hand man. We need to look at things more deeply and get rid of exaggerated media like Fox.
MicahSchweitzer
000001463
000001987
Anonymous
Curtis
Anonymous
Anonymous