Global Science community: an idea for improving "good" science
Someone posted an idea about "good VS bad" science. I think this is very important. But that post lacked, in my opinion, real solutions. I propose that we make an NGO or a government-sponsored International Community of Scientist, to make an open, independent, non-linked to companies, and more efficient sciences community. For instance, the Health Sciences (and the Health services in general) are deeply harmed by the influence of Pharmaceutical Companies and other corporative interests. A non-profit Pharmaceutical research center would be very helpful, and it could invest in non-addictive, natural, eco-friendly drugs, in diseases prevention (that is not a goal of Health Industry, given that they profit from diseases) and such. This Community could have a Website, where part of the Science could be made by volunteers around the globe, and specialists hired by the Community would evaluate these volunteer research and make their own researches as well. Other areas besides Health that would be strategical, urgent, good for everyone: Environment and Energy, Transportation, Peace Studies.
5 Comments
000000002
PetrKropotkin
Anonymous
It was just "Enos, son of Seth, grandson of adam"/8 "octagon", see hexagon saturn, and the relation and what pentagon?
All the world of science, energy, health, etc, about the "angel of war, our war, from the" book "dead sea scrolls".
Read all comments at, translate first from Indonesia:
www.niochengyam.wordpress.com/2012/12/09/3/
Help orphans (their families from 9:11 Pentagon in year 2178), from karma and reincarnation who are not compassionate.
TQ.
Gerals
Indeed, they're associated with government and special interest funding.
it's why the popular opinion amongst scientific communities won't tolerate scientists and studies that oppose the leftwing opinion, because their funding demands that their research support the left wing opinion, or risk losing it.
You seem to lack a fundamental understanding of how our research is paid for regarding the more controversial issues in our society.
You can't have fair and accurate science by cutting out business funding and not cut out public funding. You have to cut out both or neither because either way, from government or business, research becomes biased towards what will maintain funding.
guilhermearbache