'good' versus 'bad'
Science is neutral. Scientists, however, are driven by personal motives. Remove the motivation for bad scientists (usually located around personal gain and/or esteem) and the problem is solved.
Similar Ideas:
Inovate the inventors
74 votes
7 comments
If we're going to explore space, we should develop a code of conduct in case of any contact with any race, sentient or non-sentient
37 votes
21 comments
Two planet species
34 votes
29 comments
Global Science community: an idea for improving "good" science
16 votes
5 comments
Plan for Space Colonization
15 votes
10 comments
Internet
12 votes
8 comments
15 Comments
babelfish
AdmiralCheung
1. You can't remove motives from people without significant brain surgery or mind reading (which in itself should never happen regardless of people's nature)
2. It is often these Bad scientists that allows advancement.
What would be a good idea is to allow scientists to do things without the limit of morals, I don't mean let them take people from the streets, no. I mean death role prisoners who consent for experiments. By removing boundaries set by a flawed human state of mind makes huge advance in science.
MicahSchweitzer
liquidsmoke206
Stteffann
JohnJed
GD000001469
Mick
AbyssalNightmare
Frankhey
ezone
bruce.tutty
000004219
OmegaForte
There are merely objectives to be achieved in scientific research, like the perfection of the absolutely driest martini. The problem isn't the scientists, or the sciences, it's the corporations that hire them to create a "product." Globalization of corporations is the downfall of all aspects of mankind. I've never met a 'mad' scientist, I've only met angry scientists who are tired of poor working conditions and lack of gin breaks.
000004443