No intelligent design in science classes
There is no scientific evidence to support creationism or intelligent design, so it should not be taught in science classes. It may be taught in a philosophy class as an idea (not as truth), or a private religious school. Tax payer money should not go to teaching children myths rather than science.
Similar Ideas:
Alternative Education Opportunities
31 votes
10 comments
Real Food
227 votes
30 comments
Teach first aid and CPR in all schools
177 votes
38 comments
Where is the knowledge of the Creator?
16 votes
175 comments
Global Rights Education
104 votes
20 comments
Promote Music in the Schools
97 votes
12 comments
28 Comments
babelfish
babelfish
Elsie
babelfish
babelfish
babelfish
jaydencrowe
IDEAGUY
MicahSchweitzer
000001060
jmetcalfe
000001060
I'm sure you're all aware of the idea, despite it not being taught in science. We haz internetz, we don't need school to teach us every little thing! Besides, science is not a democracy, it is not determined by popularity!
smellymimipoo
Junssi
Sebbie
Creationism has a place in the worlds educational system, whether it is the Roman Catholic view, or the ancient Greek Mythological approach to the worlds creation.
As you mention, these ideas should be taught and discussed in Philosophy classes, as we can learn a lot about the different opinions these ideas suggest.
As for Science classes... They should be just that! - Science! Based on scientifically proven (or disproven) fact!
Inurdaes
Topics like this can become outmoded out of the public eye by establishing a rigorous curriculum devoted to scientific literacy, critical thinking and structured debates on topics regarding the universe we live in.
jennifer28
JHampson
alwilson5
Anonymous
Anonymous
come here at home at knock my door to begin !! I would be glady in not deny the Truth. By the way, the Holy Scriptures, NOT the quram from hell, not budhism, not anything else but the Bible, written by God, already said these days would come. One world government, one system and the persecution of Christians.
are you waiting for then? CMON
314
In fact they have over 101 pieces of reasoning or evidence to suggest that we have a young earth and a young universe. Hence disproving claims that an Adam and Eve stories are untrue.
Firstly evolution is not true since scientists have failed to find any animals transitioning from it's previous animal to its current form. For example there's no fossil evidence of a monkey turning into a human, if there is any it is highly questionable, or they've found a fossilized body part (e.g. finger) and assumed that it is a part of an animal transitioning to the next. Secondly what's happening in natural selection is that a segment of the population is being wiped out, then as a result there's more interbreeding and hence there is a devolving species, not evolving.
As well as this sometimes scientists point out that it would've taken millions of years for rocks to form as they are today. Yet they forget one simple event that happened to substantiate a young earth, there was a worldwide flood!
There are heaps of other claims refuted and heaps of other evidence suggesting creationism.
Therefore considering that creationism does have some scientific proof I object to 000001170's idea.
GD000002616
kalaniJ
haynesjames1
Anonymous
000009817
It certainly should not be in science class or taught to children as factual.
000009817